Here I am trying to explain some concepts of the Indian Companies Act through "Q & A" approach, which I believe that more helpful for understanding. I am trying to include one or two relevant case laws also. Expecting valuable suggestions and recommendations from the readers. I like criticisms also. Readers are requested to comment their views also.
The
Articles of Association of a company provides for qualification shares. A
newly appointed Director held the required shares within the prescribed time
but did not get it registered in his name within two months of his
appointment.
|
The
Companies Act, 1956 never ask for a Director to hold shares to qualify
himself to be a Director. But, if the Articles of Association of the company
provides for such a share holding by a Director, then the Companies Act, 1956
grants two months time for acquiring those shares (Section 270 of the
Companies Act, 1956). In order to be a Director, one should obtain shares
within two months of his appointment.
In
spencer
v. Kennedy, it was held that, a person cannot be said to
be qualified in respect of qualification shares unless he is registered as a holder thereof.
So
here in this case, the Director has ceased to hold his office of Director
even though he holds the shares because those are not registered in his own
name.
|
Some
important points:
|
1.
A Director
appointed under Section 408 of the Act need not hold qualification shares.
|
2.
Nominee Directors
of the financial institutions established by separate statute of Parliament
are not required to hold qualification shares.
|
3.
The Directors who
by the Articles of Association of the company are not required to hold
qualification shares, need not hold such shares.
|
4.
For the purpose of
Section 270, holding of share warrants are not sufficient.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment