The Companies Act, 1956 does not
distinguishing directors as executive and non executive. The directors are
collectively controlling the Company. Some of them actively participate in
the day-to-day affairs of the Company. But, some others concentrate on the
policy decisions and overall growth of the Company only. Their participation
limited to and ends with attending Board Meetings. Over a period, this
brought the distinction as executive directors and non-executive directors.
|
Directors who are the employees of the Company
or who are entrusted with day-to-day operations of the Company are called
executive directors. Managing Director, Whole-time Director are executive
directors. Other directors, who are from outside Company are non-executive
directors. They not employees of the Company and they receives only sitting
fee from the Company in which they are directors. They only attend the
meetings of Board and committees thereof.
|
Normally, the following tasks are
expected from non-executive directors:
·
Monitoring performance of the Company;
·
Rendering professional guidance in respective
fields of experience;
·
Provide impartial and independent advice to
the Board;
·
To keep moral pressure and a watching eye on
executive directors;
·
To prevent misuse of the authority by
executive directors;
·
Keep a balance between interests of the
Company, members, employees, and directors .
|
Case study:
|
There is no distinction between
whole-time or part time directors or appointed or nominated Director and
liability for acts of omission or commission is equal, so also the treatment
for such violations as stipulated in the Act. The Director is bound to
discharge the functions of a Director and should take all diligent steps and
care in affairs of the Company.
Madhavan
Nambiar v. Registrar of Companies, 2002
|
No comments:
Post a Comment